几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 【转帖】Alignment Update Question

		几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)\|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » 三维空间：产品设计或CAX软件使用 » CMM检测 » PC-DMIS
【转帖】Alignment Update Question

标记论坛为已读

搜索本主题

2007-11-26, 03:18 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	【转帖】Alignment Update Question Good morning All..I am attempting to move the alignment of my part 0.0304" in the Z+ direction. When I do so, should not each feature programmed in this alignment move relative to the new alignment, i.e., the features should move off of the CAD model. Thanks, Ron

GDT自动化论坛（仅游客可见）

2007-11-26, 03:18 PM	#2
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	回复: 【转帖】Alignment Update Question When you change ANYTHING in a 3-2-1 alignemnt, it should ASK YOU if you want to UPDATE the features following the alignment to the new alignment. ALMOST all the time, you will want to say NO or it WILL move those points OFF the cad model. If you are not being prompted, then you need to change one of the F5 warnings to default to "NO" and to POP-UP the window asking you. Matthew D. Hoedeman

2007-11-26, 03:21 PM	#3
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	回复: 【转帖】Alignment Update Question Okay....I got it. the CAD equals Part must be applied prior to the transformations. Ron

2007-11-26, 03:22 PM	#4
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	回复: 【转帖】Alignment Update Question Well, yes and yes...... If you do a 3-2-1 alignment, you MUST do CAD=PART if you are using cad data to program (I do it 100% of the time, with or without cad) Now, this is the most common time I would change the 3-2-1 alignment: I get a holding fixture in. I align by the numbers ON THE BASE I do a DCC alignment, using the same touches as the manual alignment I did. I will then (ALWAYS!) check the fixture locators to make sure that they check within fixture tolerance (generally less than 0.05mm / 0.002"). If so, then my alignment is done. IF THEY ARE NOT in tolerance, I will adjust the offset values in the alignment (right in the EDIT window) ONLY for the alignment made from the DCC features. The locator check features are already in the program and are AFTER the alignment. They are TO CAD DATA and they need to stay that way, so when (IF) I tweak the offset values, I TELL IT NO DO NOT UPDATE. I will then run the DCC alignment and check points to see if they are all in tolerance now. I usually get it with one adjustment, but if the locators are on wierd angles, it may take more than once. Each time I adjust the offsets, I TELL IT NO. Once I finally get all the locators in tolerance and I have made my last tweak YOU THEN MUST DO CAD=PART AGAIN or any new point you pick off the cad will reflect the amount you shifted (or changed) the offsets in the alignment. AND, in V3.7 MR3 I have noticed that you MUST DO THIS TWICE to get it to 'be right'. Matthew D. Hoedeman

2007-11-26, 03:22 PM	#5
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	回复: 【转帖】Alignment Update Question Hey Matthew, thanks for the input on the alignment problem. I will also make CAD=Part a part of my programming routine 100% as well. I may not always need to transform my model and/or translate alignments, but I do not se where it would be harmful if implemented correctly. Ron

2007-11-26, 03:23 PM	#6
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	回复: 【转帖】Alignment Update Question Be warned about this! 1) CAD=PART can not be un-done (but then, I have never wanted to un-do it) (but, you CAN re-do it to a 'corrected alignment) and 2) Some here will tell you that CAD=PART is the biggest mistake you can do. However, I have been using Pcdmis since, well, FOREVER it seems and I have never had an issue with it. Maybe back in the day, the instructors actually KNEW how to teach CAD=PART or maybe we listened better back then, but never, not once, have I had an issue with it. (now I'll get slammed!) As a side note: Many people have had issues with nominals changing in the features in their programs, slight, subtle shifts and outright changes. This is also something I have never encountered. (I'll get slammed again for this one!) I will let the student infer any connection...... Matthew D. Hoedeman

« 上一主题 | 下一主题 »

主题工具	搜索本主题
显示可打印版本发送本页给好友	搜索本主题: 高级搜索
显示模式
平板模式切换到混合模式切换到树形模式

发帖规则
您不可以发表新主题您不可以回复主题您不可以上传附件您不可以编辑您的帖子 vB 代码开启表情图标开启 [IMG]代码开启 HTML代码关闭

所有的时间均为北京时间。现在的时间是 08:43 AM.

沪ICP备06057009号-2

更多