几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量  


返回   几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 » Norm Space: Product Automatic Standards - 范数空间:产品自动化标准 » National Standards » American standards
用户名
密码
注册 帮助 会员 日历 银行 搜索 今日新帖 标记论坛为已读


回复
 
主题工具 搜索本主题 显示模式
旧 2009-04-29, 07:53 PM   #1
yang686526
高级会员
 
注册日期: 06-11
帖子: 14579
精华: 1
现金: 224494 标准币
资产: 234494 标准币
yang686526 向着好的方向发展
默认 【转帖】engineering grammer for notes

engineering grammer for notes
a co-worker and i are arguing over proper grammer as it applies to drawing notes. as fickle as this may sound, i hate being told that i am wrong without good premise. he says that any sentence must end in a period. my personal feeling is that if the note is longer than one sentence periods should be included in thas particular note only.
any direction in this matter would help tremendously.
eng-tips forums is member supported.
consistency is what makes a good dwg. either have periods on all notes or none at all.
i doubt this is covered in any recognised standard, and this question might be more suitable for
i'm not sure which standard covers this, but the global drawing requirements manual for departments of defense and commerce (based on dod-d-1000/dod-std-100) states "general notes are punctuated according to the rules of english grammar".
believe it if you need it or leave it if you dare.fff"> - robert hunter
ewh, wow, that pretty much settles it.
i've considered not using periods for list type notes like:
2. material: 316 sst
or
2. material: 316 sst.
but i've since settled on using full punctuation, even for these. it's just clearer. the only time i don't use a period is for notes with actual formatted lists, but that is rare, and i normally try to avoid documenting a spec in that manner anyway.
matt lorono
cad engineer/ecn analyst
silicon valley, ca
fcsuper,
while your notation for material call out is straight and to the point i would typically punctuate it anyway. english dictates that even one word is a sentence. no?
wes c.
------------------------------
no trees were killed in the sending of this message, but a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
no. lol j/k. thats. why. i. just. go. a.head. and. use. per.io.d.s. no.w.a.days...

matt lorono
cad engineer/ecn analyst
silicon valley, ca
matt,
are you on your ...?
(just kidding)
chris
solidworks/pdmworks 08 2.0
autocad 06
in accordance to asme y14.100-2000 "engineering drawing practices", para 4.26.6, drawing notes - contents ... "drawing notes shall be concise, grammatically correct statements."
from what i am able to find, actual punctuation guidelines are not addressed in this standard. if somebody finds something please post.
otherwise my thoughts on this subject are to be logical; if the statement is clear and concise, it is most likely a sentence. if this is so, then use a period. if not,then don't punctuate and consider revising if it is not concise enough or does it even belong.
the material callout, as used in an earlier example is not a sentence nor is it a statement. therefore, does it even belong in a general note section?
xplicator:
regarding matt's brief material sample:
does it not tell you what to make the part out of, period or not?
if the drawing format i have to work with does not have a material box in the title block area, i would make a general note just like that (although probably calling out the material spec. too).
don't get me wrong i wasn't picking on him so much as i was trying to make the bigger point to the overall scenario that it is not a concise statement, so revising it to say something like - "component material is ______." - is in order to use a period.
now, if you choose to list it as shown in the example, thats fine but it would not get a period at the end since it does not constitute a statement.
in regards to whether it belongs there or not is up to you, i don't know your situation or practices. however, it is always a good question to ask. if the answer is yes, but it needs revising, then do so. if not and it belongs in the title block or bom, than you may have proactivly squelched a potential issue.
yang686526离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)
回复


主题工具 搜索本主题
搜索本主题:

高级搜索
显示模式

发帖规则
不可以发表新主题
不可以回复主题
不可以上传附件
不可以编辑您的帖子

vB 代码开启
[IMG]代码开启
HTML代码关闭



所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 01:31 PM.


于2004年创办,几何尺寸与公差论坛"致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T | GPS研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量"。免责声明:论坛严禁发布色情反动言论及有关违反国家法律法规内容!情节严重者提供其IP,并配合相关部门进行严厉查处,若內容有涉及侵权,请立即联系我们QQ:44671734。注:此论坛须管理员验证方可发帖。
沪ICP备06057009号-2
更多