几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

wind load analysis
i am doing wind analysis on a building that is 600 ft long 180 ft wide and 50 ft high with 100 ft high tower at the end of it. there is an expansion joint right where the tower starts to separate the lower part of the building from the tower.
i was wondering if it is ok to analyze the 50ft high part of a building as low rise building and use figure 6-10 (asce 7-02) to determine external pressure coeff. cpf and then use figure 6-6 to determine external pressure coeff. cp for the tower or should i use figure 6-6 to determine external pressure coeff. cp for both lower part of the building and the tower.
i think since these two are separated by the expansion joint they will act undependably but i am not sure if such an approach is allowed.
thanks
i would analyze each as a separate building. i also would be a little careful around the juncture between the two in that higher wind vortexes/pressures could develop both on the tower walls and the roof of the low building near the ej. perhaps be a little more conservative in those areas. the building probably isn't large enough to justify a wind tunnel analysis.
i wouldn't base the wind load on the building from the height of the separate tower. there will be some different effects as the wind moves around the tower and affects the roof of the adjacent building. but you can't quantify this unless a wind tunnel test is done.
you will need more expansion joints to break up the 600 feet also.
(i didn't see jae's response before i posted.)
...but again - great minds seem to think alike, eh?
chriskrol,
geeeese, i like that "you should design the building for what the wind will see." a few months ago i designed a building in a business district (zoning issue) and i posted a question regarding the actual wind load on the upper part of the building. the neighboring buildings will likely be forever on the lot line. almost everybody understood that i was trying to underdesign the mwfrs, when what i was seeking was a more realistic (critical if possible wind load) would be applied on the building
i definitely agree that the structures at least should be designed for wind with actual "what the wind will see"
regards

2009-09-16, 09:39 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	wind load analysis wind load analysis i am doing wind analysis on a building that is 600 ft long 180 ft wide and 50 ft high with 100 ft high tower at the end of it. there is an expansion joint right where the tower starts to separate the lower part of the building from the tower. i was wondering if it is ok to analyze the 50ft high part of a building as low rise building and use figure 6-10 (asce 7-02) to determine external pressure coeff. cpf and then use figure 6-6 to determine external pressure coeff. cp for the tower or should i use figure 6-6 to determine external pressure coeff. cp for both lower part of the building and the tower. i think since these two are separated by the expansion joint they will act undependably but i am not sure if such an approach is allowed. thanks i would analyze each as a separate building. i also would be a little careful around the juncture between the two in that higher wind vortexes/pressures could develop both on the tower walls and the roof of the low building near the ej. perhaps be a little more conservative in those areas. the building probably isn't large enough to justify a wind tunnel analysis. i wouldn't base the wind load on the building from the height of the separate tower. there will be some different effects as the wind moves around the tower and affects the roof of the adjacent building. but you can't quantify this unless a wind tunnel test is done. you will need more expansion joints to break up the 600 feet also. (i didn't see jae's response before i posted.) ...but again - great minds seem to think alike, eh? chriskrol, geeeese, i like that "you should design the building for what the wind will see." a few months ago i designed a building in a business district (zoning issue) and i posted a question regarding the actual wind load on the upper part of the building. the neighboring buildings will likely be forever on the lot line. almost everybody understood that i was trying to underdesign the mwfrs, when what i was seeking was a more realistic (critical if possible wind load) would be applied on the building i definitely agree that the structures at least should be designed for wind with actual "what the wind will see" regards __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]