查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-16, 04:43 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ubc load combinations

ubc load combinations
i'm using enercal for a cantilevered retaining wall system and they have a 1.7h factor (it will multiply the force by 1.7) embeded in the design program - for where they suggest earthquake forces from the soil are entered for the design of the stem of the wall.
my question is either to use that 1.7h for the earthquake forces of the soil to the retaining wall stem or 1.1e which could be interperted as = 1.1(1.6h)= 1.76 as outlined in the 97 ubc.
also, do any of you use the smilutaneous effects of the later pressures caused by the soil and active pressures as outlined in navfac? thanks!
an obvious first step is to contact the geotech.
i would think 1.7h would be the normal non-seismic loading on the wall, and the 1.1e would be the additional forces due to seismic. the load factors have changed some; check the standards to see which ones are correct for your application. (old ones: 1.7, 1.4 factors, new ones, 1.6, 1.2 factors, for example.)
hi and thanks for the replies and input. my question stems from the fact that in the soils report the geotech specified a 18h^2 force to act simultaneously with the active pressure. since they do not do concrete engineering, they don't have a clue about the factors we use for these things (most don't). i've checked the ubc (both current and old) and it doesn't say exactly how to combine these. part of the problem arises out of the eq forces in the code (if the equations are used) are strength level while the 18h is not (eq/1.4). if you know of any other sources i could ck please let me know ... and thanks again!
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)