几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

tension-only bracing
is it appropriate to use tension only members in k-bracing or v-bracing in an ocbf?
check out our whitepaper library.
if one leg of the chevron does not act it seems to me that it is no longer a concentric system.
no,
do a free body diagram and you will figure out why.
csd
csd72
can you be more specific.are u concern with the vertical component of the tension bracing at the mid of span of the beam ?
shbh,
yes, it is the large vertical force in the centre of the beam, the brace no longer acts as a k-brace(where the 2 vertical components cancel each other out) and will be a very innefficient way of bracing.
csd
thanks everyone for your comments!

__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]

2009-09-16, 01:22 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	ension-only bracing tension-only bracing is it appropriate to use tension only members in k-bracing or v-bracing in an ocbf? check out our whitepaper library. if one leg of the chevron does not act it seems to me that it is no longer a concentric system. no, do a free body diagram and you will figure out why. csd csd72 can you be more specific.are u concern with the vertical component of the tension bracing at the mid of span of the beam ? shbh, yes, it is the large vertical force in the centre of the beam, the brace no longer acts as a k-brace(where the 2 vertical components cancel each other out) and will be a very innefficient way of bracing. csd thanks everyone for your comments! __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]