查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-16, 11:35 AM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 structural ridge beam lvl

structural ridge beam lvl
my architech speicfied a structural ridge beam for my home addition. he will be using a 24' long x 5 1/4" thick x 14" deep 2.0e lvl. the roof load will be 30live/15dead. the room span is 20' i am concerned that this beam may sag over time as it is a 24' free span. can someone framiliar with glu lams give me there thoughts on this design.
thank you.
find a job or post a job opening
glulams can be selected from a load table. you might want to ask them if there is a benefit to chosing the next larger, you might want to have him double check that all loads were on the high side, and you might ask him if he would specify something else if cost wasn't a consideration.
loads have a lot to do with climate. there are wind and snow loads. where are you located?
are the supporting columns adequate? if you are having doubt about the beam, what about the supports?
a 14 inch beam for a 24 foot span is probably marginal if deflection is a concern. the international paper catalog for 2.0e lvl engineered beams does show 16 & 18 inch depths available. one of these may be a better choice.
do keep in mind that any beam (wood, steel, it does not matter) will "sag" - it is working like a giant spring to carry the load. however your roof will be "seeing" the dead load only, most of the time (unless you have a lot of snow). live load capability will be required typically for times of high wind.
one way to address this subject with your architect is to ask for a total load (not just live load) deflection limit of 1/240; this will probably force him/her to select a deeper beam.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)