查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-15, 09:39 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 shear friction vs shear studs

shear friction vs shear studs
i have a question about the connection requirements for shear friction (concrete to concrete) versus shear studs (steel to concrete). why is it that with shear studs they typically only need to be embeded into the concrete a couple of inches (2" +/-) while the requirements for shear friction connections (per aashto) require that hooked dowel bars be embeded a minimum of 6". aren't they both doing the same job?
thanks
corey r.
find a job or post a job opening
i'm not a bridge engineer (so am not familiar with aashto), but i assume the 6" is required to develop the hooked bar. a headed stud is developed by the head.
daveatkins
it seems to me that the anchors/rebars across a shear-friction interface is mainly used to guaranty the clamping force, and to contribute a shear component (if rebars in angle) against the apllied shear force, while the shear studs are designed with their shear capacity directly.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)