主题: r=3
查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-15, 04:07 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 r=3

r=3
in designing steel for seismic forces, where does it say if you use r=3 or less you dont need to design with the special seismic provisions? aisc? fema350?
check out our whitepaper library.
end of table 1617.6 of ibc.
part 'e' of inverted pendulum systems.
why it is under inverted pendulum systems, i have no clue, but this is what the bldg. departments are going by (so i have been told).
ibc section 2212.1.1 is the section you're looking for. it says for structures in seismic design category a, b or c you can use the r of 3, and not have to conform to the aisc seismic provisions. sdc d, e & f is required to conform per section 2212.1.2
2212.1.1 is restating what the table gives you.
as i understand it, you still have to use the omega and cd values that is at the end of the table i mentioned as well. you can't use r=3 and then whatever omega and cd values you find that match your actual system from the table.
re: ibc table 1617.6
ibc misprinted the early versions of the code putting structural steel not detailed for seismic... under item 6.
it is now separated into its own category, item 7.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)