查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-15, 01:37 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 post embedment equation

post embedment equation
ibc 1805.7.2.2 equations 18-2 and 18-3 (also "a" for eq. 18-1)
is the "b" suppose to be in the denominator or the numerator?
seems like denominator would make more sense. increasing the pole diameter decreases the embedment depth, right?
you got it. i brought it up in this thread some time ago.
right or wrong, it's been written this way ad infinitum.
mike mccann
mmc engineering
au contraire, the 1994 ubc has it written in a less ambiguous way, with a horizontal division line, with b in the denominator, where it belongs.
thanks for the help. i searched the old threads but didn't find that one.
the "pole building design" document by donald patterson provides a derivation and a chart of the non-constrained equation. "a" clearly ends up in the denominator.
the document has been referenced several times in these forums. do a search to find the link.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)