查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-10, 01:06 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 masterspec vs. spectext vs. specsintac

masterspec vs. spectext vs. specsintact
given the choice of a master specification for structural items, which would you choose, and why: aia masterspec, spectext, or specsintact.
also, what positives and negatives have you encountered working with these specification systems.
find a job or post a job opening
i'll start.
aia masterspec
+fairly up to date
+fairly complete
-some items are definately geared towards architects (division 4)
-some items aren't fully incorporated (special inspection)
spectext. i don't have any experience with it.
specsintact
-very out of date
-very incomplete
the only time i would use specsintact is when the client requires it.
if i had to choose, i'd choose aia masterspec, not because i think it's great, but it's the only one i've worked with that i don't absolutely hate.
are there any viable options other than these three choices?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)