查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-09, 06:47 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ibc collector design

ibc collector design
i have a 2 story building that has eccentrically braced frames through entire length at each story. the frames are stacked. this is seismic category c. i will design the collectors at the roof for the special combinations of 1605.4.
i'm not sure what to do for the second floor collectors. the roof forces will be going directly into the 2nd flr frames from the columns, plus the collectors have to be designed for the 2nd floor seismic force too. but how should this total horiz. load to the 2nd flr collectors be combined (qe)?
1) omega x[roof minimum + floor minimum diaph force]
minimum meaning comparing eq.16-41 to eq.16-64 for each
level, using the one that controls in each case.
2) omega x[floor minimum diaphragm force (16-41 or 16-64)
+ the roof level force from 16-41].
3) omega x[floor minimum diaphragm force only] + roof force
from 16-41
i discussed this with someone else i work with. i think that as a diaphragm part, the 2nd floor collector horiz force should be checked for h=(f2 or fpmin)x omega. as a frame
on second thought, or third, i think where i have gone wrong in this whole thing is with the definition of a collector. even though each frame beam will collect the diaphragm force tributary to it's frame, i don't think it is really a "collector" or what the code has in mind for a collector or drag strut. since the frames are continuous from one end of the bldg to the other, no real "collectors" are present on the roof or floor. anyone disagree?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)