查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-09, 06:41 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ibc 20002003 response modification factor r for dual system

ibc 2000/2003 response modification factor r for dual system
ibc 2000 / ibc 2003 table 1617.6.2 shows a building response modification factor "r" for a dual system of imrf (i assume it could be of either steel or concrete
material) with ordinary reinforced concrete shear wall as 5.5.
in the same table it shows, r = 5.0 for an ordinary reinforced concrete shear wall, r = 5.0 for a concrete imrf and r = 4.5 for a steel imrf.
why is that the r value of the dual system higher than those of the individual systems?
thanks
find a job or post a job opening
dual systems have more redundancy built in - the moment frames are required to carry a minimum of 25% of the story shear even if their actuall stiffness does not attract that much.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)