几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

ibc 2000 ~ 2003, base shear
i have to update a calc of base shear from ibc 2000 to ibc 2003. i see only one eq (16-56) relevant. is it so simple now? no consideration to sd1. thx in advance for your comments
not so simple...cs is computed from sd, etc
eqn 16-56 is for using the simplified procedure. looking at section 9.5.5.2.1 in asce 7-02 you will see that there are 4 equations to be calculated. the first is for cs and the rest are for the upper and lower bounds of cs. the variables used are sds, sd1 and s1.
regards,
-mike
the ibc 2003, through asce 7-02, equivalent lateral force calculations are almost identical to 2000. the approximate period calcs are a little different and i think they clarified the insane requirement to iterate to determine ax. i can't remember if anything else changed, but the results end up being very similar.
14159

2009-09-09, 06:41 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	ibc 2000 ` 2003, base shear ibc 2000 ~ 2003, base shear i have to update a calc of base shear from ibc 2000 to ibc 2003. i see only one eq (16-56) relevant. is it so simple now? no consideration to sd1. thx in advance for your comments not so simple...cs is computed from sd, etc eqn 16-56 is for using the simplified procedure. looking at section 9.5.5.2.1 in asce 7-02 you will see that there are 4 equations to be calculated. the first is for cs and the rest are for the upper and lower bounds of cs. the variables used are sds, sd1 and s1. regards, -mike the ibc 2003, through asce 7-02, equivalent lateral force calculations are almost identical to 2000. the approximate period calcs are a little different and i think they clarified the insane requirement to iterate to determine ax. i can't remember if anything else changed, but the results end up being very similar. 14159 __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]