查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-09, 06:36 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 ibc 06 vs acse 705 special seismic load combos

ibc 06 vs acse 7/05 special seismic load combos
i have reviewed other threads in the site and i have not come across this specific question. any insight would be appreciated. ibc 06 section 1605.4 includes the same combination for both asd and lrfd(strength design; however, the asce 7/05 includes two sets of load combos: one for asd and one for lrfd. my question arises as i look at a sample problem from ncees in which there is an analysis of a collector element in which case the sample problem uses the ibc combo 16-22 to calculate the actual bending stress, but uses combo 5 under asd to calculate the actual axial stress. (as i have noticed in another thread, i do realize that ibc combo 16-22 equals asce 7/05 combo 5 under strength design, but this is not the case under asd). should one adhere to the equations set forth in ibc even when using asd design processes which would be the conservative approach or use the equations within asce 07 for asd? i may be misinterpreting the code or have overlooked something.
again, i appreciate any feedback.
stu
mrpid,
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)