几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子 - fatigue-sizing a shaft subject to torsion

fatigue-sizing a shaft subject to torsion
hello
which equivalent stress should i use for fatigue calculations on a shaft subject to pure torsion?
von mises and maximum principal differ significantly in this case and give hugely different fatigue lifes.
thanks
gio1

check out our whitepaper library.
i generial use von mises. its is also what most fea show. what type of load do you have with pure torsion?
if you want to be on the safe side go with the shorter life.
chris
"in this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics." homer simpson
this is the 2nd kick at the cat for this topic ?
i'd use principal, but then petersen bases his kt on shear stress = t*16/(pi*d^3), refer fig 79, pg 105. but then in this case principal = shear, no?
rb1957
yes this topic has moved to the fea section, sorry.
your point is interesting, if petersen used max principal for kt then it must apply for fatigue
(kt is the concentration factor for fatigue, right?)
thanks
gio1
sorry, i think the concentration factor in fatigue is kf...
kt is general usage (in my mind at least) for stress concentration. some folks make a distinction between stress concentration for static loads and stress concentration for fatigue

2009-09-09, 11:19 AM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	fatigue-sizing a shaft subject to torsion fatigue-sizing a shaft subject to torsion hello which equivalent stress should i use for fatigue calculations on a shaft subject to pure torsion? von mises and maximum principal differ significantly in this case and give hugely different fatigue lifes. thanks gio1 check out our whitepaper library. i generial use von mises. its is also what most fea show. what type of load do you have with pure torsion? if you want to be on the safe side go with the shorter life. chris "in this house, we obey the laws of thermodynamics." homer simpson this is the 2nd kick at the cat for this topic ? i'd use principal, but then petersen bases his kt on shear stress = t16/(pid^3), refer fig 79, pg 105. but then in this case principal = shear, no? rb1957 yes this topic has moved to the fea section, sorry. your point is interesting, if petersen used max principal for kt then it must apply for fatigue (kt is the concentration factor for fatigue, right?) thanks gio1 sorry, i think the concentration factor in fatigue is kf... kt is general usage (in my mind at least) for stress concentration. some folks make a distinction between stress concentration for static loads and stress concentration for fatigue __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]