查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-08, 05:30 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 design of a rubble and mortar building wall

design of a rubble and mortar building wall
i am looking at determining the structural capacity of a laterally loaded rubble and mortar wall. the wall is approximately 150 years old and forms an exterior leaf on an old farmhouse.
does anyone know of any references which would give an indication of determining capacity? the problem being that these things can be so variable in terms of material and construction i would expect it is very difficult to quantify.
check out our whitepaper library.
hello ussuri
there is no guidance given in bs 5628 for flexural resistance of random rubble masonry for the very reasons you state - the extreme variability of the quality of construction.
just out of interest, why are you carrying out the assessment ? perhaps a more prudent approach would be a visual assessment that the wall is plumb and not showing signs of distress etc.
alternatively, another approach would be to demonstrate that no net tension is developed in the masonry due to lateral loads (p/a +/- m/z) - but this usually requires very massive walls for success.
vb
valleyboy
cheers for the reply.
bs5628 does give a little guidance (clause 19.1.10) allows you to take the characteristic strength as 75% of the equivalent if it were a natural stone construction. it further reduces it if lime mortar is used by 50% of mortar class m2.
as you can see its very rough and i have no idea where the 0.75 and 0.5 come from and on what justification.
i'm looking at this as a favour for a friend. she is doing some internal modifications to her house and needs to submit to building control for a building warrant. the wall they want to remove is load bearing and their builder has just told them to replace it with a flitch beam.
that's is all well and good, however, the wall is also 'possibly' (i haven't been to have a look yet) an internal return to the exernal wall. this is more of a concern as if this is the case removing it will effectively reduce the exterior wall to a one way spanning panel. and due to the age of the building i expect there to be little or no structural connection at the wallhead to the intermediate floor diaphagm.
i am expecting i will need to include a pier or at worst case a small internal portal. i guess i have to wait and see until after i have had a nosey.
you might try "structural analysis of historic buildings" by j. stanley rabun, published by wiley.
there is a section on buildings with brick and dimension masonry walls.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)