查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-07, 04:28 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 boston big dig tunnel collapse 2

boston big dig tunnel collapse 2
here's a recent enr report:
a new update with photos and a bit more description on who did what and when.
the highway research center report quoted is sobering news, especially as it says not only would fast-set epoxy "fail decades before nearing this service life", but that standard-set epoxy would also fail in time.
all the testing and information which has come out on the failure due to epoxy creep has come from the highway research center. i wonder what happened to the wiss janney elstner report. they were commissioned to investigate, but i have seen nothing of their work reported. maybe the grand jury has it. they have also been appointed to investigate the i35w bridge collapse.
indicted:
it has always been very odd to me that the power-fast system has both fast- and not-so-fast set adhesives.
you have to really read the fine print to see the (significant) difference. if i didn't know differently i'd think all the powersfast adhesive is fast setting.
i guess they figured "powersstandard" wouldn't sell.
it sure won't sell now.
mike halloran
pembroke pines, fl, usa
i think all suppliers of epoxy for construction have two or more set times. i checked and found that locally, florida, that the fast set out sells the standard set three to one. the ratio of sales last month was 2 to 1 with the mention of heat being a problem. this month it should be closer to 50/50, again due to heat.
the plot thickens, sometimes.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)