查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-07, 04:07 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 bolt edge distance

bolt edge distance
different edge distances are allowed depending on what type of edge is present on the steel (per aisc, aashto, arema, etc.). there are 2 classes, 1 is rolled or thremally cut, the other is sheared. my question is what about edges that have been sawed. to me sawing steel would be the same as rolled and thermally cut because the damage to the steel is not like when the steel is sheared, but that is just my guess. what do others allow/think......
i would agree.
sounds reasonable to me.
the above advice is not correct if you are in australia where our code, as4100, has 3 classes. a rolled edge is in its own class.
apsix
is thremally cut in the same class as sawed then?
if i had to guess, i'd put sawed in the same category as rolled edges. there are concerns about microcracking in sheared edges and hardening of thermal-cut edges, neither of which apply to sawed edges. (and in the u.s. codes they decided there was no longer sufficient concern about the tces to classify them in with the sheared edges, so now they're in with rolled.) however, the end of a saw cut might be ragged and subject to the same concerns as sheared edges.
on the other hand, it could be argued that saw-cutting is a form of shearing. i'm inclined not to argue that, but i could be persuaded.
hg
dwha, hgtx
the 3 classes by as4100;
1. sheared or hand flame cut
2. machine flame cut, sawn or planed
3. rolled edge
with edge distances equal to 1.75, 1.5 & 1.25 x bolt dia respectively.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)