几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

asce7-05 redundancy factor
i am looking for opinions on what the appropriate redundancy factor would be for a tank supported by six legs with cross bracing. the seismic design category for the location is d. this would be a nonbuilding structure and in section 15.6 this factor is allowed to be taken as 1.0.
my question comes from the language used in this section. it states that nonbuilding structures that do not have lateral and vertical seismic force resisting systems that are similar to buildings shall be designed in accordance....
now would the cross braced legs on the vessel be considered similar to a building and require the larger value of 1.3 to be used or since the legs are integral with the tank can 1.0 be used?

2009-09-07, 01:28 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	asce7-05 redundancy factor asce7-05 redundancy factor i am looking for opinions on what the appropriate redundancy factor would be for a tank supported by six legs with cross bracing. the seismic design category for the location is d. this would be a nonbuilding structure and in section 15.6 this factor is allowed to be taken as 1.0. my question comes from the language used in this section. it states that nonbuilding structures that do not have lateral and vertical seismic force resisting systems that are similar to buildings shall be designed in accordance.... now would the cross braced legs on the vessel be considered similar to a building and require the larger value of 1.3 to be used or since the legs are integral with the tank can 1.0 be used? __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]