几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

asce 7-05 compared to earlier 7's
anyone have any online references to documents that compare the asce 7-05 with earlier versions, preferrably 7-98?
find a job or post a job opening
jae - looks like you will have to "piecemeal" reviews of the changes. here is something on snow loading from the american wood council
sorry - i guess i'm actually after wind provisions. forgot to mention that.
jae
the gostructural site has run a number of articles, starting about 1-1/2 years ago,that covers changes from the 97 ubc to the 2000, 2003 & 2006 ibc. the articles cover wind seismic and other stuff.
the major change in the wind load section is that method 1 now includes topo affects. the bad news is that method 2 is still a pain in the hind end.
good luck !

2009-09-07, 01:05 PM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	asce 7-05 compared to earlier 7s asce 7-05 compared to earlier 7's anyone have any online references to documents that compare the asce 7-05 with earlier versions, preferrably 7-98? find a job or post a job opening jae - looks like you will have to "piecemeal" reviews of the changes. here is something on snow loading from the american wood council sorry - i guess i'm actually after wind provisions. forgot to mention that. jae the gostructural site has run a number of articles, starting about 1-1/2 years ago,that covers changes from the 97 ubc to the 2000, 2003 & 2006 ibc. the articles cover wind seismic and other stuff. the major change in the wind load section is that method 1 now includes topo affects. the bad news is that method 2 is still a pain in the hind end. good luck ! __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]