查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-07, 12:31 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 app. d vs shear friction

app. d vs shear friction
per aci 318-05 11.7.4.3, you can use headed studs as shear friction reinforcement. if you use the shear friction reinforcement provisions for an embed plate subject so shear only, do you still have to use app. d? i have some high brace forces to get into a grade beam. using app. d, i am getting 6' long embed plates just to get the concrete pryout capacity to work out from app. d. i thought i might be able to get out of that by using the shear friction provisions, but wanted to get some opinions.
find a job or post a job opening
one other thing i forgot to bring up. 11.7.8 says that the reinforcement must be fully anchored on both sides of the shear plane. i understand why this requirement is there, but does this then kick you into app. d for the hca to ensure they are properly anchored?
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)