查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-07, 12:10 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 angle end condition question

angle end condition question.
please see attached file.
my question is in real world design, what kind of end condition you guys will take it as (end condition in figure 1 and figure 2)?
thanks a lot for your precious oppinion.
both pinned.
is the member a flexural member and what is the direction of loading?
i agree with nutte that designing as a pin ended
you would generally model both as pinned conditions; however, just because you model them that way doesn't mean that's the way they react. for either condition, you can create a force couple between the bolts, thus induced moment in the angle.
what is the error for assuming one condition or the other? run them both way and you'll see the differences. if you are looking at bending, a pinned condition will give higher midspan bending moment than fixed condition. if you're looking at sizing the angle based on bending, then that's more conservative. if you are looking at stress concentrations around the bolt/connection area, then a fixed condition might give you a more conservative result there.
in reality, the actual answer is somewhere between. there will be some moment developed, but probably not enough to reduce the midspan moment appreciably.
sorry, i forgot to mention that these angles are purely compression
k=1.0 with added moment, p x e, due to eccentricity from the support.
k=1 both cases. figure 1-potentially eccentric, figure 2-not eccentric
ron,
i'd be suspicious of z-axis eccentricity in figure 2. unless you had slip-cirtical bolts, there is the potential that some rotation of the angle could be allowed.
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)