几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 - 查看单个帖子

2003 ibc out-of-plane seismic
ubc 97 section 1632.2 gave an out-of-plane seismic force for structural walls. i am trying to find the equivalent in ibc 2003 and asce 7-02. so far i have come across ibc 1620.2.7 but this is under the simplified annlysis procedure 1620.2 and would almost never be used on the west coast. i have come across asce 9.5.2.6.3.2 but this is anchorage only. also asce 9.6.1.3 has out of plane similar to ubc but is only limited to non-structural walls. has anyone found the elusive requirement? again, ibc out-of-plane forces for structural walls.
thanks in advance.
asce 7-02 9.5.2.6.2.8 says "...bearing walls and their anchorage shall be designed for...". it's misleading because the section is titled "anchorage of concrete or masonry walls" but it includes requirements for the design of the wall itself, not just the anchorage.

2009-09-07, 08:26 AM	#1
huangyhg 超级版主注册日期: 04-03 帖子: 18592 精华: 36 现金: 249466 标准币资产: 1080358888 标准币	2003 ibc out-of-plane seismic 2003 ibc out-of-plane seismic ubc 97 section 1632.2 gave an out-of-plane seismic force for structural walls. i am trying to find the equivalent in ibc 2003 and asce 7-02. so far i have come across ibc 1620.2.7 but this is under the simplified annlysis procedure 1620.2 and would almost never be used on the west coast. i have come across asce 9.5.2.6.3.2 but this is anchorage only. also asce 9.6.1.3 has out of plane similar to ubc but is only limited to non-structural walls. has anyone found the elusive requirement? again, ibc out-of-plane forces for structural walls. thanks in advance. asce 7-02 9.5.2.6.2.8 says "...bearing walls and their anchorage shall be designed for...". it's misleading because the section is titled "anchorage of concrete or masonry walls" but it includes requirements for the design of the wall itself, not just the anchorage. __________________ 借用达朗贝尔的名言：前进吧，你会得到信心! [url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]