查看单个帖子
旧 2009-09-05, 11:29 PM   #1
huangyhg
超级版主
 
huangyhg的头像
 
注册日期: 04-03
帖子: 18592
精华: 36
现金: 249466 标准币
资产: 1080358888 标准币
huangyhg 向着好的方向发展
默认 real time digital controls

"real time" digital controls
i am involved in global positioning system user equipment. i am interested in any information in which trade studies have been made between achieved positional accuracy and response time.
find a job or post a job opening
please elaborate; your question is unclear.
response time of what? it's irrelevant by itself and only meaningful when related to a speed, e.g., you can have absurdly slow response, so long as you go slow, in which case you can still achieve the desired accuracy.
ttfn
i am involved in global positioning system user equipment. i am interested in any information in which trade studies have been made between achieved positional accuracy and response time.
clarification:i was asking if there have been any studies of accuracy vs response time. i agree that slow response could mean very accurate but vehicle response even in the frequency range of 10 to 20 hertz range can produce much larger errors. another way of phraseing it would be "what is the throughput time or frequency respones of the user vehicle receiver?"
technically, you can only get updates of gps at 1 hz rate, which is set by the gps satellite, so still unclear about you're asking, since every receiver meets the 1 hz update rate.
technically, accuracy is fixed by the diddling of the satellite signal, so response time of receiver is irrelevant again.
ttfn
__________________
借用达朗贝尔的名言:前进吧,你会得到信心!
[url="http://www.dimcax.com"]几何尺寸与公差标准[/url]
huangyhg离线中   回复时引用此帖
GDT自动化论坛(仅游客可见)