几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量

几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 (http://www.dimcax.com/hust/index.php)
-   产品功能分析 (http://www.dimcax.com/hust/forumdisplay.php?f=10)
-   -   single-angle member in compression by aisc (http://www.dimcax.com/hust/showthread.php?t=28821)

huangyhg 2009-09-15 10:59 PM

single-angle member in compression by aisc
 
single-angle member in compression by aisc
i wonder which radius of gyration of cross-section, rx, ry, or rz, should be used in the calculation per aisc, lrfd for single-angle members?
the question is not answered from the specification. from the commentary c4 of the specification, it seems to me that since the flexural-torsional buckling strength calculation is approximated by the reduction factor q, the calculation of lamda in eq. 4-1 and 4-2 is from either rx or ry, not rz. however, in example e4.3 of aisc manual of steel construction (lrfd), rz was explicitly used, which resulted in a design strength of 28.7 kips.
according to the commentary c4 again, for more conservative values, the strength can be calculated as per appendix e of aisc lrfd, which directly considers the flexural-torsional buckling (but is more mathematically difficult). funny thing is that i obtained higher strength from the supposed-to-be-conservative approach. for the single angle in the example e4.3, the strength i got is then 42 kips.
any comments?
find a job or post a job opening
here is how i handle angles, you are right, neither rx or ry are used. we must not have the same lrfd editions, but when i work with single angle compression members i calculate an rw and rz. major axis w-w, and minor axis z-z. in lrfd second edition i use example 3-8, in asd nineth edition example 10 p. 3-55.


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 07:22 AM.