masterspec vs. spectext vs. specsintac
 

masterspec vs. spectext vs. specsintact
given the choice of a master specification for structural items, which would you choose, and why: aia masterspec, spectext, or specsintact.
also, what positives and negatives have you encountered working with these specification systems.
find a job or post a job opening
i'll start.
aia masterspec
+fairly up to date
+fairly complete
-some items are definately geared towards architects (division 4)
-some items aren't fully incorporated (special inspection)
spectext. i don't have any experience with it.
specsintact
-very out of date
-very incomplete
the only time i would use specsintact is when the client requires it.
if i had to choose, i'd choose aia masterspec, not because i think it's great, but it's the only one i've worked with that i don't absolutely hate.
are there any viable options other than these three choices?