![]() |
paper sizes
paper sizes
i've just been hipped to the knowledge that 11x17 (ansi c) is the most favored paper size for contract drawings. who agrees/disagrees? i disagree, i think iso a1 is the most popular. oooops, 11x17 is ansi b. sorry, sorry... it would not surprise me because you could easily fold it into a binder and many copiers will handle it. i prefer d size but my field is machine design. it has enough room for most components without crowding views and dimensions and you can fold it into an a size. i can't stand e size and will use multiple sheets of d before i make one single e drawing. they are too hard to fold and you can't lay them down on a desk (at least on mine), not to mention plotting them. i see d as the most popular. most details fit on it and it is easily reduced to fit size b. chris sr. mechanical designer, cad solidworks 05 sp3.1 / pdmworks 05 i agree with chris. d is a good size. you can fit much detail on it and it is still readable when printed to a b size. any larger format, and you loose too much when printing to b. i've always like a1 and a2 sizes for metric and thier closest ansi relatives, the c and d size. they're just much easier to handle, fold, and lay on other people's desks. if i'm going to be explainging a print to several people in a board room i'll print out the a0, but otherwise it's gotta be a managable a1. i like to hang e sized drawings on the wall. it is an ideal size for arrangements, where you want maximum size and detail. i have a strong preference for 1:1 scale on fabrication drawings. in many cases, you can do a quick and dirty inspection by lying the part on the drawing. this results in a lot of e and d_sized drawings. if you use 4mm or 5/32" fonts, the full sized drawings are readable from a distance (when they are hanging on somebody's wall), and the reduced sized prints are readable. our assembly people do not want to see anything larger than d_size. big drawings do not fit on work benches. jhg i'm with chris on this d-size then print 1/2 scale 11x17. although, i have done multi sheet e size drawings for some pump housing castings and machine drawings. our assembly dept. barks at anything over a b-size. it would be a wonderful thing if we could really go paperless....wasn't that the initial selling point of cad? best regards, heckler sr. mechanical engineer sw2005 sp 4.0 & pro/e 2001 dell precision 370 p4 3.6 ghz, 1gb ram xp pro sp2.0 nivida quadro fx 1400 o _`\(,_ (_)/ (_) "there is no trouble so great or grave that cannot be much diminished by a nice cup of tea" bernard-paul heroux heckler, i agree. our company announced 2 years ago we were going paperless. everthing went on-line, automated, etc. now we generate more paperwork than ever! chris sr. mechanical designer, cad solidworks 05 sp3.1 / pdmworks 05 d-size seems to be the way to go. we are quite some distance away from our mfr, so every drawing is made a d-size pdf. we print a hard copy on 11x17 here in the office, and they can print whatever size works best for them there. pdf actually is great. i think we may even go from hard copy to pdf only if we can figure it out... then only print something out if necessary... which now that i think about is is all the time.. but what the hell... many wrong paths where departed walked with good intentions... from the wall of our faa inspector. "we will become a paperless office, when the earth becomes a treeless planet...then we'll switch to synthetics" put me down for ansi b. rerig |
所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 05:34 AM. |