几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量

几何尺寸与公差论坛------致力于产品几何量公差标准GD&T (GDT:ASME)|New GPS(ISO)研究/CAD设计/CAM加工/CMM测量 (http://www.dimcax.com/hust/index.php)
-   American standards (http://www.dimcax.com/hust/forumdisplay.php?f=81)
-   -   【转帖】undimensioned tolerance (http://www.dimcax.com/hust/showthread.php?t=14812)

yang686526 2009-05-04 11:01 AM

【转帖】undimensioned tolerance
 
undimensioned tolerance
i have a drawing that states the following :
interpret drawing per asmy14.100-200, dimensions and tolerances per asme y14.5m.
in the drawing all the dimensions in the drawing are untoleranced. do i interpret these as basic dimensions?
find a job or post a job opening
there should be a tolerance block somewhere on the drawing format. that, or a note stating that untoleranced dimensions are basic.
it's not uncommon to place that in a note "all untoleranced dimensions are basic" but you must also account for all permissible geometric variations. this can be done by having a global note stating a general surface profile. i've seen this on complex castings.
best regards,
heckler
sr. mechanical engineer
sw2005 sp 5.0 & pro/e 2001
dell precision 370
p4 3.6 ghz, 1gb ram
xp pro sp2.0
nivida quadro fx 1400
o
_`\(,_
(_)/ (_)
"coming together is a beginning, staying together is progress, and working together is success." - henry ford

we also use "all dimensions are reference"
we do this if we buy a part as is and just want some dimensions for information purposes. it allows a receiving inspector to verify that we have a 1/4-20 x 1 inch long bolt, but he doesn't have to do a layout on the part.
thanks to all that replied.
it turns out i was not given all the information. i only recieved the drawing not the specification sheet with the tolerance block.
seems a little queer that someone would put a tolerance block on a separate specification sheet, instead of on the drawing (where it would actually be useful).
sunthorn-
maybe this is pulling hairs, but the drawing should simply say "interpret drawing per asme y14.100m." since y14.100m invokes y14.5m, then it's redundant to invoke them both. also i believe that y14.100m says that the year of the standard should be left out of the callout (you might want to confirm this!).
tunalover


所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 11:53 PM.