![]() |
【转帖】asme standard for dimensioning cut tubing
asme standard for dimensioning cut tubing
is there a place int he asme standard that specifies how to dimension a stock tube cut to length with an angle on the end. i am getting different interpretations on dwgs i am seeing. options: 1)overall length and an angle 2)length on each side of the tube 3)something else thanks check out our whitepaper library. awidrig, i am not aware of a specific asme procedure for dimensioning cut tubes. overall length and angle, and length on each side of the tube are interpretable by asme y14.5m-1994. i, personally, would prefer overall length and an angle. is this process tubing, or are these precision machined parts? if this is a precision machined part, your overall length with a ± tolerance, is ambiguous. the machinist is going to take the sharp edge off, and this will affect your as-measured length. if your length and angle are basic dimensions, you can apply profile and angle tolerances to the angled face. this makes for a precise definition of your tube end. jhg drawoh: where are you envisioning the basic length dimension of the tube to terminate? at the oal of the tube? at the center of the angle (centerline of the tube)? checkerron, i have designed and drawn up a number of 45° mirror mounts, which present the precise dimensioning problem described above (by me, if not by the op). i show the height to the top, sharp corner. it has never occured to me to dimension to the centre. the maximum height is more useful to a machinist. the centre height requirement is to the top face of the optic, and is shown elsewhere in my documentation. a sloppy diameter does affect the position of the angled face. on occasion, i have drawn phantom lines off to the side, and applied a basic dimension to the vertex. however you do it, the feature is not directly measurable. you have to specify a basic dimension, and attach an fcf to the angled face. my drawings are to a large enough scale that there is no confusion about what i am dimensioning to. i do not see a way around this. if you want to do single-line tubing isometrics, you are going to have to cut your tubes off straight. jhg drawoh: actually i would dimension it to the oal the same as you, and not to the centreline of the tube, but the question popped in my mind as i read your third paragraph. i'm not sure why (in retrospect) since you did say straightaway that you preferred overall length and angle. i guess i got sidetracked in that discussion about rounding off the corner. respectfully, i am trying to use my best english english. my buddy kenat would appreciate that. |
所有的时间均为北京时间。 现在的时间是 09:54 AM. |